WATCH: Go Home Obama! Armed Ammosexuals In Oregon Yell As President Meets With Victims Of UCC Massacre (VIDEO)

WATCH: Go Home Obama! Armed Ammosexuals In Oregon Yell As President Meets With Victims Of UCC Massacre (VIDEO)

President Obama traveled to Roseburg, Oregon to meet with the survivors and victims families of the Umpqua Community College shooting, but not everyone was happy to see the president.

Hundreds of ammosexuals some armed lined the streets as President Obama made his way through town. The protestors were holding signs and yelling at the president to Go Home, because they are upset about his stance on gun laws.

That person doesnt think guns are the reason people are dead, instead they are blaming it on Obama taking religion out of school. You know, the place it shouldnt be in the first place according to the Constitution.


Another totally not racist protestor told the president to Go Back To Kenya.

And then there were the brilliant folks who brought their guns to the protest just a week after a massacre nearby.

These people are the scum of the earth. Obama isnt a threat to our country, they are. Watch the ignorant fools and their asinine protest, below:

Featured image via Twitter


‘s reelection campaign. Join her on her Angry Liberal Bitch Facebook page.

  • Twitter

  • Facebook

Shannon Argueta

Latest Posts By
Shannon Argueta

  • Florida Mayor Bars Donald Trump From Entering His City (TWEET)
  • Obama To Cowardly NRA Puppets: Its Insane People On No-Fly List Can Buy Guns (VIDEO)
  • 12 Things Only The Working Poor Truly Understand Holiday Edition


  • Airb0rne4325

    And not a single one of those scary guns shot anyone, you hoplophobe.
    There was a stabbing in China recently and it was under reported, as was the Australian shooting. You know, the same Australia that so many of your ilk love to parade around as the way America should go with its mandatory buy back program AKA confiscation.
    Drugs are illegal, still have a problem with it here.
    Rape is illegal.
    Murder is illegal.
    Just because you make something illegal doesnt mean it is going to magically go away. It goes underground and goes to the black market where it is still a problem. Bigger even, because now the honest law abiding citizen cant even protect himself in his own home.
    When you hear a bump in the night and are looking at the face of someone you dont know in your home, who you gonna call? Someone with a gun, and you are gonna pray they get there in time to save you. Good luck with that.


    • Rick Derris


      • bart007

        Except the President who went on National TV and actually said that we need laws like Britain and Australia, who confiscated guns with mandatory gun buyback programs. So theres that.


        • Rick Derris

          Really? Did he say the words, Britain, and, Australia?

          I didnt hear that.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Yes. He did…


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Stupid moron:


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Perhaps you should listen more carefully and stop being so willfully ignorant.


          • Tipper3

            HE PRAISED THOSE COUNTRIES FOR THEIR LAWS ON GUN CONTROL, HE DID NOT SAY WE NEED LAWS LIKE BRITAIN AND AUSTRALIA. YOU SUBTLY TWISTED THE WORDS…PLEASE DONT.


          • Rick Derris

            Yes, you are the fourth reply to mention it. Thank you.

            You left your caps lock on.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            And all of you are completely delusional. Ok, so just what WAS Obama saying here? Hmmm?


          • Rick Derris

            You know Ive been making it a policy to not talk to the trolls, but since you keep replying to me, Im just going to say thing:

            NO I WILL NOT MAKE OUT WITH YOU!

            Im sorry you have no friends to talk to, but Im not going to be one of them. Like I said last time I replied to you, if you want friends, youre going to have to be a nicer person.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            So, youve got nothing. I thought not. Keep up with your lies and misdirection, its going so well for you and your buddies on your little hack site here.


          • Rick Derris

            You call it having nothing.

            I call it not wanting to talk to you because youre a terrible human being who lashes out on the internet to compensate for his lack of friends.

            Good day, sir.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            And I call you a pathetic little p*ssy who cant actually back up his reasons for wanting to disarm the good, law-abiding people of the USA. Im not worried though, were kicking your candy a s s e s up and down in every arena, because regular people see right through your BS, especially when you make strong assertions like this that turn out to be bold-faced LIES when exposed to even a modicum of scrutiny.

            You can b*tch and moan and call me whatever names you want, and make up ad hominem BS about my supposed lack of friends, but when push comes to shove, all you do is run away like a p*ssy. Fine by me. run away little p*ssy.


          • LadyBligh

            lol


          • LadyBligh

            Yeah, youre real brave lol


          • LadyBligh

            So scary!


          • LadyBligh

            Youre so brave for being a troll!


          • LadyBligh

            So brave!


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Again, just what WAS Obama saying here? You really dont think that he wants gun control like they have in those places here?

            Just FYI, Australias gun buyback had ZERO effect on crime or suicide rates in that country. The fact that you ignore this clear evidence and just shout silly little deflections sends a message loud and clear: you know youre wrong, and youre too cowardly to actually defend yourself against someone who actually knows this stuff. Pathetic.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Uh huh. So just what WAS Obama saying here? That he thinks that Australia is a nice thought experiment? That since Australia hasnt had a mass shooting since their gun buyback (FALSE btw) we DO want to continue having mass shootings like Charleston, and NOT do what they did? Give me a freaking break!


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Go ahead and keep screaming your lies there buddy, maybe if you scream long enough youll actually start to believe them yourself.


        • Maskof1000Faces

          Fun fact: Neither Britain nor Australia have banned all guns.

          Clueless rant is clueless.


          • bart007

            They may as well have banned all guns lets not split hairs on what is considered banned. I guess you would be OK with shotguns but not military assault weapons, while Australia requires people to register air rifles, and only certain professions can own semi-auto and pistols after a period of training and monitoring. So no ban but so restrictive that it would clearly violate our Constitution.


      • Kerchak

        Actually, Ive seen more than a few anti-gun people who say Guns only for the Police and Military.


      • kkb

        Redneck morons with guns is what needs to be corrected. They should have to pass an IQ test before theyre allowed to even pick up a gun. That would stop all conservative (R) idiots from having guns and these school shooting would stop cold. Stupid sixth grade dropouts with guns that hate to read and love to shoot people.


        • bart007

          Much like those of you who vote with your feelings instead of facts. Much like your post; which is filled with vitriol and childish ranting from someone who clearly believes that they are smarter than they are and cannot grasp facts over feelings.


    • CleverBev

      Airborne, perhaps one of the reasons those scary guns didnt shoot anyone was because their owners knew that Secret Service sharpshooters, who Im betting are better shots, would have made short work of them. Meanwhile, while you and your ilk insult the President and present ranting and lies for argument, there were TWO college campuses that had shooters today. Wow, a stabbing in China. When was the last time a stabber took out three dozen people at a time?


      • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

        Three dozen? Funny you should ask, because this latest mine attack with KNIVES in China saw over 50 dead, thats over FOUR dozen.

        http://www.rfa.Org/english/news/uyghur/attack-09302015174319.html

        Stop with your ridiculous whining and projecting. These people were protesting peacefully, unlike your Black Lies Matter heroes that burn down the town when things dont go the way they want. Secret Service Sharpshooters my rosy red a s s.


        • Tipper3

          And you mention #BlackLivesMatter…thanks for the plug. Now, stick to the issues and if you cant well, we understand.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Nice. Way to ignore my entire post minus the one tiny part you actually have an answer for. Funny how the larger point goes totally over your head, eh?


    • Lincoln F. Sternn

      Are you really such a dummass or are you just trying to get attention?


      • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

        Is name-calling really your only response? Dont you actually have a counter-argument? Didnt think so.


        • Lincoln F. Sternn

          No, it is just my go to response for the deliberately stoo-pid. By his and your ridiculous, infantile logic we should just get rid of all laws since some people are going to just break them anyway. You dont have the brains to understand laws are the mechanism for punishing bad people. Now, why dont you do us all a favor, go home, kill everyone there, then yourself? Do that for the gene pool, wont you?


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Wow, you libturds are so bigoted and hateful, I feel sorry for you.

            Your ridiculous straw man argument is getting you NOWHERE. Only people like YOU claim that we should get rid of all laws since some people are going to break them.

            Our REAL argument is that we should not be passing laws that will do more harm than good, and that do not promise to improve things at all. Shouldnt good laws fit the problem they are designed to address?

            Can you tell me, which of the presidents recent gun control proposals would have stopped the Oregon shooter? How about the Charleston shooter? How about any of the others? Go ahead, well wait…


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            you libturds are so bigoted and hateful

            God, you fckng hypocrite. Please, just friggin die. Quick and painless, slow and obscene, I dont care. Just friggin die.

            Your REAL argument? Buttsniffers like you whine every time any gun legislation is proposed, no matter how common sense, no matter how much potential good it might do. So please, just die. You are a liar and a hypocrite.

            As for the examples you mentioned, there is no way to know. But shucks, we may as well not even try, since we cant come up with a perfect, 100% effective solution. We may as well just throw in the towel and do nothing.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Tell me, what is so common sense about passing even MORE background checks when the ones that we currently have do not work at all? Hmmm?

            What is so common sense about banning an entire class of weapons in common use when these weapons are used to commit fewer crimes than are sticks, stones, fists, feet, and all other non-firearm weapons?

            You can whine and pontificate all day long about common sense, but when push comes to shove, even a cursory glance at these proposals reveals them to be anything but common sense.

            There is no way to know if these laws would have stopped these shooters?!?! WRONG. Each either passed a background check or stole their guns. No new law would have stopped ANY of them, especially any supposedly common sense law currently being proposed by Dems in this country. But by all means, continue whining and wishing death on those you disagree with, and dont let the facts get in the way of your preconceptions, thats against the Liberal Way after all.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Background checks dont work?
            God, you are a fckng imbecile. I used to think you just trolled for attention, but now I am coming to realize you really are that special kind of stoo-pid.
            You whine like a candyassbitch all of the time, so spare me your thoughtful insights into anything that requires thought. You dont have any.
            As Ive said a hundred times, the inability of people like you to consider a bigger picture is the most tragic part of these conversations.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Let me ask you this: how do you know that our background check system is working? What does working mean to you? Keeping guns out of the hands of criminals? Reducing homicide rates? What?


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            To answer your firt question, fktrd, because national police agencies like the FBI say so.
            And, if you can find anywhere where I positively advocate assault weapons bans, I will buy you a lollipop. Banning automatic weapons in the 20s made it REALLY hard for the mob to buy Tommy guns, which until then you could buy over the counter. Just a little history lesson for you there. But, since most homicides and suicides are committed with hand-guns, taking assault weapons out of the picture will only affect a small percentage of crazy people and white-trash, ammosexual, teabagger, fuktrd militia types. So, I am on the fence about that.
            As usual, you are trying to make a very complicated situation simplistic, I assume so it doesnt befuddle you as much.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Gee, look at that simplistic little answer with ZERO thought behind it. National police agencies like the FBI?? Um, no they dont, they simply report on how many people are denied gun purchase through legal means. Do you seriously believe that just because someone is denied a gun through legal channels that they dont find a way to get one later? The facts dont agree with you on this one.

            Plus, you didnt answer the question: what does working mean to you? How do you know that a particular gun law is working or not?


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Um, yea they do, fktrd. Read their websites. Listen to the testimony they have repeatedly given before congress.

            What does working mean to me? Are you really that foolish? It means the same thing to me as it does to any other thoughtful, intelligent person. It means criminals, domestic abusers, alcoholics, the mentally unstable AND the people they live with, and white-trash, ammosexual, teabagger, fuktrd militia types will have to obtain weapons illegally, which will give the law reason to lock them away.
            The facts dont have to agree with me, fktrd, I agree with the facts.

            Now, please, go kill yourself. Honestly, what argument or solicitation will get you to do the noble thing and kill yourself?


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Um, no they dont. The FBI only prosecutes a tiny percentage of people who fail background checks, and there is ZERO evidence that these laws do anything other than deny those barred from owning weapons a purchase through legal means.

            So, according to your definition, a gun law is working if it makes it more difficult for undesirables to obtain weapons AND turns those you disagree with into criminals?? Wow, I thought gun laws were supposed to reduce gun violence, not turn more regular people into criminals. Wow, if you were less angry and more honest, perhaps you could see how foolish you sound.

            Your definition makes clear that you dont actually care about gun violence, all you care about it control. Hardly surprising.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            there is ZERO evidence that these laws do anything other than deny those barred from owning weapons a purchase through legal means.
            God, you are the stoo-pidest mthrfkr who ever lived! That is the whole point of background checks you fckng fool, to deny the purchase of weapons to those who, for whatever reason, are denied that right.

            I am done with you. You are so fckng stoo-pid that even when you make my point you think you have accomplished something.

            Again, please, for the love of God, kill yourself.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            I thought the whole point of background checks was to keep guns out of the hands of those that shouldnt have them. The problem is that these people just turn around and acquire guns through ILLEGAL means. You should know, btw, that even the vaunted Brady Bill has been deemed a failure by leading gun control researchers. Phillip J Cook, considered by many to be the nations leading authority on gun control, has called the Brady Bill a failure, due to its inability to lower gun homicide rates even in the slightest.

            http://www.law.virginia.Edu/html/news/2003_spr/cook.htm

            Plus, there is no evidence whatsoever that universal background checks do anything at all to reduce crime, as almost no criminals get their guns through the type of private transactions these laws would criminalize.

            Instead of actually answering to this point, you just run away? Fine by me. You clearly cant defend your position, so you angrily throw more insults and run and hide. Typical behavior from the gun grabbers I see on here all the time. Enjoy your little echo chamber, because out in the real world, no one else is on your side.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            taking assault weapons out of the picture will only affect a small percentage of crazy people and white-trash, ammosexual, teabagger, fuktrd militia types.

            Well, Im glad to see that you do have at least one bit of common sense. However, you DO realize that the AR15 is the most popular rifle in America, right? There are millions of these in circulation, and tens of thousands of them in NY and CT where 90% of gun owners refused to register their assault weapons, even in these very blue states. Kinda puts a damper on your only white-trash ammosexual militia types own these weapons, huh?


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Wow, a fktrd judging my level of common sense. How cute.

            Yea, I know a lot of people who own AR-15s. So what? Reading comprehension a weak point for you, obviously, since I didnt say those are the only people who own them.Those arent the people I worry about. Its the flea-ridden company you keep I worry about.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Yes, you, unlike most people on your side of the issue, seem to accept the fact that banning millions of weapons that just about no one uses in crimes doesnt make any sense.

            You know a lot of people who own AR-15s?? I suppose that those people must be among that small percentage of crazy people and white-trash, ammosexual, teabagger, fuktrd militia types, since, according to you, these are the only people who own these weapons, eh? Dont be a douchenozzle dude.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Nothing at all to say on your LIE that there is no way to know if these proposed laws would have stopped any of these shooters??

            Guess its rather hard to argue with the fact that all these recent shooters either passed a background check or stole their guns, and that most used handguns, not scary, black assault weapons. NONE of the gun restrictions being proposed by the left would have made any difference at all, and you full well know it. Course, your anti-gun crap isnt about saving lives, its about control.


    • Pat Mckenny

      Yeah, why even try its just 30,000 people a year.


      • Kerchak

        You realize that more than half of those killed themselves?


        • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

          Actually, its fully 2/3, at about 22,000. Subtract the numbers of gun homicides that happen due to gangs, drugs, and poverty and youll see that the US is actually an extremely safe place if youre not suicidal or involved with drugs and gangs.


    • kkb

      Hahaha, that stupid rhetoric is ridiculous. Do you gun nuts honestly think intelligent people are impressed by your Pools, cars, knives idiocy? It simply shows how moronic you people are.


      • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

        Intelligent people realize that cars and pools kill even more people than guns, yet no one is whining about banning or restricting these things further. And you can save your whiny little but, but, guns were designed to KILL! baloney, because we all know full well that guns can do so much more, most of the time they are used for legal self defense they are not even fired.


    • kkb

      The only airborne you are is airborne virus. Nice try, faker.


  • Ricardo Rebelo

    Obama is a traitor and should get back in the WH while he still can! Shame on him for using this to his agenda!!!


    • Linda Pacheco

      you might have been right if he went there to make a public speech but he went to meet PRIVATELY with the families who wanted to meet with him, No One forced them.


      • Ricardo Rebelo

        If he went to meet PRIVATELY with the families why make such a public fuss?! Lets face it, its all for his agenda!


        • Kim Pieper

          No you dumba**, the people protesting made it such a public fuss! Duh! No one is taking away anyones guns, President Obama has been in office for 7 years and it sure seems like there are plenty of guns out there, considering all the mass shootings taking place! But oh yeah lets have more people have more guns, so there are more shootings, that sounds like a logical well thought out plan insert sarcasm!


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Because even an illegal muslim lke him has to obey the US Constitution…


          • Bronxboy47

            Nonsense, illegal dictators dont obey the constitution>


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Youre right! He doesnt!


          • Bronxboy47

            First you say he has to, now you say he doesnt have to. Youre all over the map, Ricardo. Does he or doesnt he, or does only his hairdresser know? Why not just call him a ni&&er and have done with it? I know you wanna, and youll feel so much better afterwards.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Boy… You are slow… YES, he has to respect it! NO, he does not respect it. Oh, and heres a bonus info: those gutless republicans on Congress do nothing about it!


          • Bronxboy47

            I guess youre determined to keep your hatred of your black president bottled up inside. Well, thats on you. Speaking of slow, what kind of slow dictator hasnt made a move for over seven years to confiscate anyones guns. Whats taking him so long, if as you say Republicans are just letting him run wild? You have a blood clot in your brain and its called racism. Im afraid the prognosis is negative.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Why hasnt he made a mov? Simple! There are more guns in civilian hands than in the entire PLA (look it up). So, he just moans and complains and tries but really cant do anything at all… Even as dictators come, not even at that he his good… LOL

            As for your acusation of racism, I was wondering when it would show up :)


          • Bronxboy47

            The head of the NRA, Lapierre, went on national television and warned America hysterically, Obama will be coming for everyones guns during his first term. When that didnt happen, just like the nuts who keep revising the date for the end of the world, he comes back on television, and with no explanation for why his first prediction failed, he just repeats his dire warning and says it will definitely happen during Obamas second term. So, the head of the NRA stirs up nightmare fantasies for weak-minded gullible haters like yourself, knowing full well that, according to you, none of this confiscation scenario could ever happen?


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Not as long as we the people, and the NRA, keep vigilant! Never fall asleep…

            Was it not Thomas Jefferson that said: Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty ?


          • Bronxboy47

            Good, stay vigilant while the one percent gradually robs you of your money and your freedom.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Thats one way to admit you dont have comeback, I guess… Thanks!


          • Bronxboy47

            You havent answered why we must remain vigilant against a scenario you yourself admit couldnt possibly happen. Ill wait while you bake another pretzel.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            You got it backwards again (were your parents related?)… It cant happen as long as we remain vigilant…

            The fact that americans are well armed is a necessary condition to prevent the seizing. But it is not a a sufficient condition…

            And now I guess you are going to ask me the difference…

            *sigh*


          • Bronxboy47

            Yes, I know, the black boogie man has invaded the White House and now we must all befor the very first timevigilant against our own President. I wish you werent so transparent.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            I wish you would stick to the issue instead of using the race card each time you dont have a comeback…


          • Bronxboy47

            But Im telling you, race is the issue, and naturally I would expect you to disagree. Youve done so. And were done.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            I though guns and Obamas sugestion that we seized arms, made this week, was the issue… Go figure…


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Nice deflection. Way to stay on point there libnut.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            I notice you dont mention WHY Obama has failed to curtail our gun rights. He has tried very hard, but thanks to the efforts of Lapierre and others, we have stopped him DEAD in his tracks. Hilarious how you make this claim without understanding it at all. Were it not for the NRA and similar groups, the Obama admin WOULD certainly have passed gun restrictions. Obama wants us to do what Australia has done with their gun laws, he has said exactly this quite publicly. Stop with your dishonest drivel, please.


          • Bronxboy47

            You predict Obama is coming for your guns, something you admit he would fail at if he ever tried it, and then when he doesnt do what you assure us hes going to do, twice no less, then you claim he didnt do what he must have known he couldnt do because you sounded the alarm. Yeah, thats the ticket.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Swing and a miss. What do you suppose will happen if we stop being vigilant? You know full well that if the NRA were to stop sounding the alarm that people would relax and let their guard down, giving Democrats the opening they need to pass even more gun restrictions. The 1994-2004 assault weapons ban is an example of such a letting down of the guard, and it will not happen again. Course, you want us to let our guard down, so I see where youre coming from.


          • Bronxboy47

            So, I expect in the interest of vigilance we can expect to be treated to neverending hysterical Paul Revere rides screaming The British are coming!!! when, in fact, no one is coming. That makes a lot of sense. Ever hear of the boy who cried wolf one too many times?


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            LOL, you just refuse to get it, dont you? Where do you suppose that our gun rights would be without the NRA? Right where you want them Im sure. Plus, history shows us very clearly that the gun control British are certainly coming, as do the Dems every time they open their mouths on anything gun-related. Obama is AGAIN talking about going around congress on guns. POS.

            So much dishonesty, no wonder you side is losing this argument so badly.


          • Bronxboy47

            Apparently, youve covered the mirrors in you house for the duration, otherwise you be able to see how every one of the accusations you hurl at me fit you like a well-tailored suit. Id laugh, if I didnt think you were seriously ill. The whole hes coming for your guns nonsense is merely another cooked up excuse to fear and hate our first black, foreign-born, incompetent, illegitimate, Muslim, traitor president.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Nice deflection. Name-calling and changing the subject away from the matter at hand.

            For the record, Obama himself has NOTHING to do with this. Hes a Dem, and the Dems are the ones constantly trying to curtail our gun rights. Plus, you are making the strawman argument that somehow only gun confiscation is the only thing that matters to us. Also completely untrue.

            When are you going to admit that (were the NRA not sounding the alarm, that the restrictions they are warning about WOULD have happened?


          • Bronxboy47

            Ive just checked you out, and not surprisingly, I find you prefer to do your forays on the intellectual battlefield from behind a cloak of anonymity. I have neither the time nor the inclination to argue with sockpuppets.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Or the skill, apparently. Youre just a dime-a-dozen libturd who turns and runs when backed into a corner. Youve been proven wrong, so you deflect and call names instead of having the courage to admit when you are (partially) wrong about something.


          • Bronxboy47

            Just exercising my own personal vigilance. Surely you can empathize with that.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Making sure that your preconceptions arent challenged? Sure, I suppose that makes sense, cant have the truth interfering with your comfortable little worldview.


          • Bronxboy47

            Since you seem neurotically committed to having the last word. allow me to formally grant it to you: Have at it, Hoss.


          • Bronxboy47

            More importantly, where would the thousands of innocent children and adults lost to gun violence in this country be without the NRA?


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Well, since 2/3 of the deaths that you include in your gun deaths whining are actually SUICIDES, and most of the rest are directly due to criminal activity, drugs, and gangs, wed be in almost exactly the same place we are now, only that regular people wouldnt be able to defend themselves, and our violent crime rates would look like they do in England, much higher.


          • Bronxboy47

            Need I remind you, gun restrictions are not synonymous with gun confiscation except to hysterical and gullible old ladies.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Sure, but gun confiscation is not our only concern. Weve given up enough of our freedoms, and for what? There is no evidence at all that any of these gun restrictions have done anything at all to reduce gun violence, so why would we give up even more of our rights for no return?


          • Steeltown Gal

            Since when is it illegal to be a Muslim?


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            Illegal AND muslim… Is that better?


          • Steeltown Gal

            No, since hes clearly a Christian and was born in the good ol USA to an American citizen mother. Ted Cruz, on the other hand……


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            He is clearly NOT a Christian and last time I checked Kenya was not a state. Also, Ted Cruz never lied about his origins…


          • Steeltown Gal

            Well he wasnt born in Kenya, he was born in Hawaii. He attends church every Sunday and during the elections, plenty of people were moaning and complaining about his pastor, Reverend Wright. Unless you can provide clear, substaniated evidence that he attends a mosque, you have no proof that he is a Muslim, other than what you heard on Fox News or some other untrustworthy site. The point about Ted Cruz is that he was born in Canada to a Cuban father and his mothers citizenship at the time has come under question. Also, until very recently, dear Teddy was a dual US-Canadian citizen, complete with Canadian passport. Within the last couple of years, he renounced the Canadian citizenship and turned in his Canadian passport. Donald Trump supposedly sent detectives to Hawaii to prove that President Obama was not really born there. That was quite some time ago and were all still breathlessly waiting for the proof, which I suspect will not be coming any time soon, since there is none.


          • Ricardo Rebelo

            It was Kenya… And the funny thing is that it was the cuckquean that was on to it since 2008…


          • Steeltown Gal

            Once againplease provide demonstrable proof that he was born in Kenya. Copies of his Hawaiian birth certificate are available on line, and reporters have interviewed former staff at the Hawaiin hospital where he was born who still remember his mother giving birth there. With as much as the right wing absolutely detests the man, dont you think that they would have been able to prove unequivocally that he really isnt an American citizen by now? If they could prove it, why would they not? They could get rid of him instantaneously. What would be their motivation to keep him around? That makes no sense. So, if YOU have proof that he was born in Kenya, you should share it with Congress ASAP, so the right thing can be done and have him removed from offfice.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            I hate this birther argument, because even IF it is true (highly doubtful), it doesnt matter; Obama is still qualified to be president. If even one of your parents is a citizen (Obamas mother), then that person is a citizen. Ted Cruz is in exactly the same boat.


          • http://www.drudgereport.com Ritardo Rebelo

            kneya not cuntry i reed a lot and kneya is in afrca and afrcia is cuntry they hav liens ther and i want pet wun.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            I dont believe that Obama was born in Kenya either, but why did his bio in the 1991 Harvard Law Review state that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii?? Was someone lying about him then? Or are they lying about him now?


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Cruzs mother was born in Delaware, also a citizen. Cruzs father is a Christian pastor. Its like he and Obama are different sides of the exact same crappy coin.


          • pianoman

            I read somewhere that Rafael Cruzs father was actually a deep-cover communist agent, sent to destroy America. Of course, there was no real evidence to back up the claim, but in todays world who cares about facts.


        • Steeltown Gal

          Hey, genius. The protestors are the ones making the public fussNOT the President.


          • Smidnite

            And showing a callous disregard for those mourning the victims.


    • http://www.drudgereport.com Ritardo Rebelo

      Me no liek Obuma he bad man why he no liek guns i liek guns my mom say si cant no have them but on day i wil shot her to.


      • http://www.drudgereport.com Ritardo Rebelo

        guns guns guns bang bang bgan


  • Linda Pacheco

    a tad shy of the touted 8,000


  • nehpets123154

    You can say whatever you want to or spin it anyway you choose. Theres a lot of folks in the United States, who have not gotten over the fact.That we have a twice elected President who just so happens to be Black!!!!!!!!!


    • Kerchak

      Why the scare quotes?


  • Ricardo Rebelo

    Just replace the towns name and you get how Obama and Hitlary care about people…


  • Gotitbutsmh

    Dont those people have jobs, my taxpayer dollars are supporting them blah blah blah. LOL They can do what they want, is this really news?


  • http://www.drudgereport.com Ritardo Rebelo

    why we hav bad blak man presdunt my schol say i can evan be a prsdunt evan thoe i eat to much glue dring plaetime but glue is gud tastng and make me fel funy liek when moms new frend jery gives me pill and i fal aslep and he rubs my bething sute parts


  • Rick Derris

    Wingnuts hate America. Thats all there is to it.


    • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

      Yup, you leftist wingnuts are by far the worst, look at the names you call those you disagree with, ammosexual and tea bagger being the least of these. We arent the ones who hate this country so much that we are trying to fundamentally transform it to suit our Marxist agenda.


      • Lincoln F. Sternn

        Says the imbecile who thinks hes being clever with the term libturds.
        Havent you had the integrity to kill yourself yet?


        • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

          yawn, no valid argument, so we go straight for the angry name-calling. Kinda getting under your skin, am I little libturd?


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            As for valid arguments, make one, and I will destroy it like I have all of your other posts.

            No, your simple minded patter doesnt bother me. But, I do find your blatant, repetitive ignorance and hypocrisy offensive.

            I dont know if it is feigned for the attention you get (the most likely scenario), or if you really are a complete imbecile, but it doesnt matter. It is the persona you project, so you have to suffer the consequences of it.

            I am going to leave you with this thought, which you will never understand.

            History is going to vindicate me and convict people like you, so you can sit there smugly drooling on your keyboard until the end of time. It wont make any difference because you will still be, forever, on the losing side of this argument.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Oh, so you just act this crazy and unhinged with everyone? Um, ok psycho.

            Oh, youll destroy my arguments like last time when you ran away like a lil b*tch instead of answering my questions on background checks? You know, truly destroying someones argument requires facts, evidence, and/or logic, not just a bad temper and name-calling. Pretty pathetic you are.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            I answered your questions, candyass. You just didnt like the answers.

            Talking to you is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how far ahead I get, you just knock over all of the pieces, crap on the board, then strut around like you just got a wink from Kim Kardashian.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Oh really? What was your answer to my argument that background checks dont make us safer, and that all they do is turn regular people into criminals? Oh yea, to call me names and run away. I guess that is an answer of sorts.

            Gee, thats quite the original playing chess with a pigeon … I feel SOOOO burned right now … LOL … How far ahead [you] get LMAO!!! Only in your own mind my lil candy a s s.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Ah, reading comprehension, not a priority in your household. Got it.

            You remind me of those stories of patients in early 20th c. asylums. They would smear feces all over themselves, lick their fingers, and gleefully cackle.
            In your case, ignorance is what you are covered with.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            So, again youve got NOTHING. No answer, just name-calling. Figures.

            Just as a reminder, background checks do NOT make us safer, this according to the nations leading gun control researcher Dr Philip J Cook (no friend to gun rights himself). In fact, they have no effect on crime rates at all. I still havent heard your answer to this clear fact, or an answer as to why we should add more gun laws that only affect regular citizens and that criminals will simply ignore.

            http://www.law.virginia.Edu/html/news/2003_spr/cook.htm


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            I have a question you will probably not answer.
            Are you honestly so fckng stupid you dont understand that something isnt against the law, until they make a law prohibiting it?

            Let me be absolutely clear with you kid. I am fully aware that nothing I say is going to get through to you. You are one of those clever kids who only hears the sound of their own voices. Ive met your ilk a thousand times in my life.

            Your infantile position on backgrounds checks is simply ridiculous. Ive explained it to you in the clearest possible terms, you just dont like the answer. Boo hoo. Go cry to your mama.

            You are the ignorant one, and you always will be. No matter how clever you think you are, no matter how cute you think you are, no matter how you rephrase a question or statement, you have always been, and always shall be, ignorant.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Am I honestly so stupid? The answer is NO, I am not so stupid, I understand this quite well. I also understand that just because something is against the law doesnt mean that we are automatically safer because of it. Drugs and gangs are against the law, yet we still have plenty of both, now dont we?

            Youve really explained very little. All you have said is that for something to be against the law, we have to have a law. You have not explained why we should make additional behaviors against the law when there is no evidence that our current laws are having any effect on gun violence rates. Are you more concerned with turning more people into criminals, or are you more concerned about reducing gun violence?? I think we have your answer loud and clear, dont you?

            Why arent you admitting that these laws do not make us safer? They clearly do not, and this is not my opinion, this is a verifiable fact put out there by real university researchers, and not people like Kleck or Lott either.

            If you can explain to me how Im wrong about this, using facts and logic instead of insults, Ill apologize and let the matter drop. Remember, this isnt about what you think should be legal or not, this is about SAFETY and reducing gun violence.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Gun violence is down every year for the last ten years, fktrd.
            And since every police agency supports background checks as a deterrent to people obtaining guns, I am going to go with them instead of listening to a total ignorant fktrd.

            And no, I dont believe for a second you would let it drop, because I have already explained that crime statistics and police agencies have said background checks work and you choose not to believe it.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Gee, just providing some vague well, police agencies say background checks work isnt going to convince anyone. I dont see any citations at all, or anything other than your ignorant opinion.

            Remember, the fact that background checks dont work isnt MY opinion, its the opinion of university researchers that study these things for a living. Heres one from Dr Phillip J Cook, widely regarded as the nations leading authority on gun control, and no friend to gun rights. He found that even the Brady Bill itself has had no discernible effect on crime rates in this country, prompting him to call the Brady Bill a failure.

            http://www.law.virginia.Edu/html/news/2003_spr/cook.htm

            By all means, provide your citation in which police agencies have said background checks work. Go ahead.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Over 10,000 people were denied the purchase of a weapon last year alone because they failed a background check. Granted, many of those were denied because of non-violent crimes, so that is questionable.
            As I said, look on the databases of agencies that track crime, or dont, you are just going to keep whining anyway.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Hmmmm, more vague assertions with no citations or other evidence. Here, let me help you with that:

            The agency that tracks crime in this country is the FBI, and here is an article about their database:

            https://www.fbi.Gov/news/stories/2013/november/nics-15th-anniversary-stats-show-success-of-gun-background-check-system

            The NCIS has processed over 177 million background checks, and denied just over 1 million people access to a firearm purchase through legal means since 1998. However, the simple fact that people are being denied access to a purchase through legal means doesnt mean theyre not getting their hands on guns. They ARE. Every last criminal out there that wants a gun gets their hands on one, and this system does not stop them. In fact, it has no effect whatsoever on murder rates or crime rates at all. Remember, this is not MY opinion, this is the opinion of leading gun control researchers.

            If you measure success by the amount of times that legal gun owners are jumping through this little hoop, youre barking up the wrong tree. I will consider this successful once it is shown that fewer gun crimes are being committed in a way that is directly attributable to this law. Right now that is NOT the case at all.


          • Lincoln F. Sternn

            Sure man.
            Keeping guns out of the hands of criminals never works.
            Can the system be better? Certainly. And Ive said so repeatedly. But your assertion that it doesnt work at all flies in the face of reality.
            Try looking for evidence other than that which supports your crybaby outlook on life and get back to me.
            Actually dont, every time I read something you write I feel like I need to give my brain a shower.


          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Just because you dont like a certain fact doesnt make it untrue.

            When leading gun control researchers examine the number of gun crimes committed BEFORE a particular law is put into place, then they examine the number of gun crimes committed years AFTER that law is put into place, control for other intervening and confounding variables, and then conclude that said law had ZERO effect on crime rates, who am I supposed to believe? The scientists that have actually done the research and see the entire picture? Or someone like you that only looks at one small part?

            You want me to look for other evidence than that which supports my [view] when youre completely ignoring the evidence right in front of your face that clearly shows that these background checks have not reduced crime rates at all, and therefore DO NOT WORK for their intended purpose?? You want so desperately for your view to be correct that you ignore all evidence to the contrary. Otherwise, you would have some logical explanation for the facts I present. However, all you have is name-calling. Go give your brain a shower, maybe youll feel a little less depressed about losing so badly.


  • Tipper3

    So, they said 7K-8K would show up and it grew from 70 to around 200…a bit short.